Archive for September, 2014
President Obama: America ‘underestimated’ ISIS
Posted by Content in American News, American Political News, International affairs, World Politics on September 29, 2014
President Obama acknowledged that the U.S. underestimated the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria and overestimated the ability of the Iraqi military to fend off the militant group in an interview that will air Sunday on CBS’s 60 minutes.
The president was asked by 60 Minutes correspondent Steve Kroft about comments from Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who has said the U.S. not only underestimated ISIS, it also overestimated the ability and will of the Iraqi military to fight the extremist group.
“That’s true,” Mr. Obama said. “That’s absolutely true.”
“Jim Clappper has acknowledged that I think they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria,” he said, blaming the instability of the Syrian civil war for giving extremists space to thrive.
The comments were among the president’s most candid to date about the rapid rise of the terrorist group that has ransacked much of Syria and Iraq in recent months.
“Essentially what happened with ISIL was that you had al Qaeda in Iraq, which was a vicious group, but our Marines were able to quash with the help of Sunni tribes,” he explained. “They went back underground, but over the past couple of years, during the chaos of the Syrian civil war, where essentially you had huge swaths of the country that are completely ungoverned, they were able to reconstitute themselves and take advantage of that chaos.”
The group was able to “attract foreign fighters who believed in their jihadist nonsense and traveled everywhere from Europe to the United States to Australia to other parts of the Muslim world, converging on Syria,” the president said. “And so this became ground zero for jihadists around the world.”
He said their recruitment has been aided by a “very savvy” social media campaign. He also blamed remnants of former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s military, which were expunged from the Iraqi military after Hussein’s fall, for lending some “traditional military capacity” to the terrorist group.
“That’s why it’s so important for us to recognize part of the solution here is gonna be military,” he said. “We just have to push them back, and shrink their space, and go after their command and control, and their capacity, and their weapons, and their fueling, and cut off their financing, and work to eliminate the flow of foreign fighters.”
The U.S. has been launching air strikes at ISIS targets in Iraq for weeks, and the administration expanded that campaign to include targets in Syria this week. The president also sought and received congressional authorization to equip and train moderate Syrian rebel groups to take the fight to ISIS on the ground.
But as he has before, the president said that a lasting peace can only be secured with a political solution.
“What we also have to do is we have to come up with political solutions in Iraq and Syria, in particular, but in the Middle East generally that arrive in the combination between Sunni and Shia populations that right now are the biggest cause of conflict, not just in the Middle East, but in the world.”
U.S. lawmakers on Sunday stepped up calls for congressional authorization of President Barack Obama’s war against the Islamic State militants, amid signs the United States and its allies face a long and difficult fight.
U.S. House Speaker John Boehner told ABC’s “This Week” that he believed Obama had the legal authority for strikes against Islamic State, but would call lawmakers back from their districts if Obama sought a resolution backing the action.
“I think he does have the authority to do it. But … this is a proposal the Congress ought to consider,” Boehner said, warning that the United States could eventually be dragged into another ground war in the region.
Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat and member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told CNN that Congress should debate the issue because of uncertainty about how long the U.S. military would remain engaged in Syria.
“There are some serious questions that we have to ask,” Murphy said. “You need a realistic political strategy. And I just don’t think we have that today in Syria.”
Sergei Lavrov Launches Attack on U.S. and NATO Over Ukraine
Posted by Content in European Politics, International affairs, World Politics on September 28, 2014
The Russian foreign minister issued a blistering attack on the West and NATO on Saturday, accusing them of being unable to change their Cold War “genetic code” and saying the United States must abandon its claims to “eternal uniqueness.”
Sergei Lavrov’s assault appeared to be an extension of the increasingly anti-Western stance of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who is riding a wave of popularity at home with his neo-nationalist rhetoric and policies.
Speaking at the United Nations General Assembly, Lavrov said the crisis in Ukraine was the result of a coup d’etat in that country backed by the United States and the European Union for the purpose of pulling Kiev out of its “organic role as a binding link” between East and West, denying it the opportunity for “neutral and non-bloc status.”
Lavrov also said the Russian annexation of Crimea earlier this year was the choice of the largely Russian-speaking population there. Former Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev transferred control over the strategic Black Sea region to Ukraine from Moscow in the 1950s.
Immediately before Lavrov spoke, the German foreign minister said Russia’s actions to retake Crimea were a crime.
“Russia has, with its annexation of Crimea, unilaterally changed existing borders in Europe and thus broke international law,” Frank-Walter Steinmeier said in his address to the world body. He spent considerable time speaking about what the West sees as Russian meddling in Ukraine, a nation on the verge of bankruptcy after a series of corrupt post-independence regimes.
Lavrov made no mention of Western allegations that Russia has sent troops and heavy weapons into eastern Ukraine in support of pro-Russian rebels there who have taken over a number of key industrial cities after the ouster of former pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovich. His departure followed months of demonstrations against his corrupt rule.
Russia routinely denies its forces are involved.
Lavrov rejected that Western economic sanctions would cause Russia to reverse course on the issue of Ukraine.
“Attempts to put pressure on Russia and to compel it to abandon its values, truth and justice have no prospects whatsoever,” Lavrov said.
The regime has been using the sanctions in a propaganda drive to build support at home, creating anger against the U.S. and Europe as a distraction from the pain that Russia’s citizens absorb from the punitive measures.
The Kremlin’s growing anger with the United States and Western Europe springs from long-standing and bitter complaints over the past two decades about NATO expansion into former Soviet satellite nations in Eastern Europe and some Baltic nations, once Soviet republics. Lavrov insisted Russia was promised, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, that the expansion would not occur.
There now is a cease-fire, though routinely violated, in eastern Ukraine. Lavrov and other Russian officials now say they believe a settlement is possible, given the wobbly cease-fire and new Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko’s decision to delay implementation of the country’s economic association agreement with the European Union.
But, Lavrov said, the Ukraine crisis should be a lesson to Washington and NATO against trying to break “the deep-rooted and fraternal ties between the two peoples” of Russia and Ukraine.
International Coalition Against ISIS Grows in Size and Strength
Posted by Content in International affairs, UK Politics, World Politics on September 26, 2014
Britain, Belgium and Denmark on Friday joined the U.S. led coalition of nations that are launching airstrikes on Islamic State group in Iraq, committing warplanes to the struggle against the extremists.
The European lawmakers flatly described the moves as critical to security on home soil, arguing that facing down terrorists has become a matter of urgency. British Prime Minister David Cameron made a passionate plea for action in drastic terms, noting that the militants had beheaded their victims, gouged out eyes and carried out crucifixions to promote goals “from the Dark Ages.”
“This is about psychopathic terrorists that are trying to kill us and we do have to realize that, whether we like it or not, they have already declared war on us,” he said. “There isn’t a ‘walk on by’ option. There isn’t an option of just hoping this will go away.”
Cameron told a tense House of Commons during more than six hours of debate that the hallmarks of the campaign would be “patience and persistence, not shock and awe,” a reference to the phrase associated with the invasion of Iraq.
That unpopular intervention has cast a shadow over the discussions because critics fear that Europe will be drawn into a wider conflict, specifically taking on the Islamic group’s fighters in Syria.
British lawmakers voted 524-43 for action after being urgently recalled from a recess. Belgian also overwhelmingly approved, voting 114-2 to take part, despite widespread concerns that more terrorism may follow in their homeland as a result.
In May, Belgium was shaken when a gunman opened fire at a Jewish museum in Brussels, killing four people. The suspect, French citizen Mehdi Nemouche, has been identified as a returning Islamic fighter from Syria, and leaders in Belgium and other European countries have expressed their fears that other returnees from Syria and Iraq may cause further havoc.
“We must fight against torture, against decapitations, so it’s time to act,” said Belgian lawmaker Veli Yuksel, a Flemish Christian Democrat
Denmark pledged seven F-16 fighter jets. Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt said her government would send four operational planes and three reserve jets along with 250 pilots and support staff for 12 months. Lawmakers in Denmark must also approve, but that is considered a formality.
“No one should be ducking in this case” she said. “Everyone should contribute.”
Britain is expected to deploy Tornado GR4 aircraft, a handful of which are in Cyprus, within striking distance of northern Iraq.
The British resolution does not address any action in Syria, though many lawmakers tried to push the government to admit that this is the likely next step.
Cameron has justified action in Iraq as lawful because the Iraqi leadership has asked for help.
No European nation has yet agreed to join the U.S. and some Arab states in strikes in Syria.
The motion before Britain’s Parliament set no time limit, and that caused unease. Many lawmakers suggested the fight could stretch for years.
“ISIS is a death cult, it’s a gang of terrorist murderers. It’s not an army and it’s certainly not an army that’s going to be destroyed by aerial bombardment,” said legislator George Galloway, using a former name for the radicals.
Cameron ensured his success by keeping the motion narrowly tailored, staving off the defeat suffered a year ago when Parliament shot down the idea of intervening in Syria to thwart Assad’s use of chemical weapons.
Defense Secretary Michael Fallon later indicated that the government might later ask Parliament for support for Syrian airstrikes.
“ISIS is based in Syria, that’s where its headquarters are, that’s where its resources, its people are. To deal with ISIS you do have to deal and defeat them in both Iraq and in Syria,” he told BBC. “We are taking this in a calm, measured way, step-by-step, but it is clear to us that obviously ISIS, in the end, has to be tackled on a broader front.”
Miliband’s Forgetful Speech on Economy and Immigration
Posted by Content in UK Politics on September 24, 2014
Ed Miliband pinned his hopes of winning the next election on a promise of £2.5billion for the NHS.
In a lacklustre speech at the Labour conference in Manchester, he retreated to his party’s comfort zone with attacks on bankers, Tories, energy companies, the media and the super-rich in what he described as his ‘job interview’ to become Prime Minister for a decade.
The centrepiece of his pitch to voters was a promise to tax tobacco companies, mansion owners and hedge funds to pay for 20,000 more nurses, 8,000 extra GPs, 5,000 careworkers and 3,000 midwives, so NHS staff are not ‘rushed off their feet’.
But during his 68-minute long address without notes, in which aides were seen actively encouraging standing ovations, he ditched a planned section on tackling the deficit and immigration, despite trailing behind the Tories on both issues.
Instead he sought to impress with increasingly bizarre anecdotes about meeting ‘ordinary people’ on his travels around the country, in offices, pubs, parks and hospital beds.
Mr Miliband took to the stage of the Manchester Central conference centre under pressure to persuade voters he is ready to run the country. A new YouGov poll shows just 15 per cent of people think he has provided an effective opposition to the government and 20 per cent say he has made it clear what he stands for. Just 18 per cent think he would be up to the job of Prime Minister, according to the survey for The Sun.
While Labour is ahead in the overall polls, it lags behind the Tories on the economy by up to 25 points.
During his long and ponderous speech, he failed to mention the deficit at all. Speaking without notes, Mr Miliband occasionally seemed to lose his way, as he repeatedly used the word ‘together’ to emphasise how he thinks government intervention can solve the country’s problems.
But Mr Miliband said he wanted to ‘restore people’s faith in the future’. He added: ‘I’m not talking about changing a policy, or simply a different programme. But something that is bigger: transforming the idea, the ethic, of how our country is run.
He said it was a ‘choice between carrying on as we are, on your own, for the privileged few.
‘Or a different, better future for our country. We are ready. Labour’s plan for Britain’s future. Let’s make it happen. Together.’
Mr Miliband made clear his intention to fight the next election on the NHS, despite it being one of the key issues on which Labour already has the trust of the majority of voters.
Setting out six goals for a Labour government to achieve by 2025, he said one of them would be to ‘create a world-class 21st century health and care service’.
The focus on the NHS suggests Labour has adopted a core vote strategy, hoping its popularity on the health service will outweigh voters’ fears about Mr Miliband’s credibility on the economy.
He also needed to address the mounting evidence that voters do not see him as a future Prime Minister.
In a section of Mr Miliband’s speech posted on the Labour website stressed that: ‘There won’t be any money after the next election.’
Mr Miliband was expected to echo Ed Balls’ promise that there will be ‘no proposals for additional borrowing’. ‘We will get the deficit down,’ the extract added. However, despite delivering more than 8,000 words during his speech, he did not mention the deficit at all.
Mr Miliband also failed to deliver a section on the economy which stated: ‘Immigration benefits our country but those who come here have a responsibility to learn English and earn their way.’
Mr Miliband stressed that the money for his NHS Plan will not be raised through taxes on working people, but instead take aim at wealthy homeowners and tobacco firms who have helped cause some of the health problems putting pressure on the NHS.
He went on: ‘We built the NHS. We saved the NHS. We will repeal their Health and Social Care Bill and we will transform the NHS for the future. ‘That’s what the next Labour government will do and we will do it together.’
Labour’s proposed Mansion Tax would be imposed on properties worth more than £2million. London will be hardest hit by the Mansion Tax, with more than 6,000 homes selling for more than £2million each year.
The latest attempt to clamp down on tax avoidance would target hedge funds avoiding millions in tax on shares, close a Eurobonds ‘loophole’ allowing firms to move profits out of the UK to avoid corporation tax, and preventing Umbrella Companies being used to avoid tax and National Insurance on expenses.
There would also be a fee imposed on tobacco firms, relative to their share of the market.
Mr Miliband said he wanted the plan was part of six national goals, ‘not just for one year or one term of office, but a plan for the next ten years: Britain 2025’.
He set out plans for as many school leavers to do an apprenticeship as go to university, double the number of first-time buyers to 400,000 to halve the number of people on low wages to 2million.
Mr Miliband also outlined an ambition for wages to rise in line with growth in the economy and the creation of 1 million more hi-tech jobs.
However, it is surprising that with eight months until the election the pledges did not cover crime, immigration, schools or Europe.
Mr Miliband is making a clear pitch to younger voters, promising them better training, more jobs and a chance to buy their own home.
On housing, Mr Miliband seeks to position Labour as the party of home ownership, in a bold move to emulate Margaret Thatcher’s vision of Britain as a property-owning democracy. Labour says that by building at least 200,000 homes-a-year by 2020, the number of first-time buyers will hit 400,000 by 2025, twice the current number.
Mr Miliband said the ‘confidence and security’ of home ownership was now beyond many people in Britain today.
He said Labour’s goal was to ensure that by 2025 as many homes as are needed are being built in Britain and the number of first time buyers is doubled.
Mr Miliband added: ‘It’s going to require a massive national effort.’
Land-banking will be stopped and a new generation of towns and garden cities will be be built, creating an extra 500,000 new homes.
‘We will also make housing the top priority for additional capital investment in the next parliament. This party will get Britain building again.’
It is the first-time that Labour has set an ambition for more home ownership, and will be seen as an attempt to woo middle-class voters who worry their children will never get on to the property ladder.
Employers who land government contracts will be forced to take on apprentices, as will large firms who hire skilled workers from outside the EU.
Mr Miliband has set an ambition that by 2025, there will be an extra 1million people in Britain working in hi-tech jobs.
In his speech Mr Miliband vowed that the next Labour manifesto would not contain any unfunded spending promises, or any new commitment to extra borrowing.